Accommodation – Ostelli Della Gioventu Sat, 08 Jan 2022 22:16:00 +0000 en-US hourly 1 Accommodation – Ostelli Della Gioventu 32 32 “Tenants without apartments for 42 years, can not deal with an allocation on a whim” | Bombay News Sat, 08 Jan 2022 22:16:00 +0000 Mumbai: “Allocation cancellations are not a matter of whim or whim of the housing council,” the Bombay High Court said last week, overturning the 2019 cancellation of an alternative housing allotment permanent to a tenant.
The attribution was made four decades after the demolition of a dilapidated building in which he resided. The Temkar Street building in South Mumbai was demolished in 1978.
The original tenant, Mohammed Usman Shaikh, and his family were moved to a transit camp in 1978. At one point, the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority (Mhada) demanded actual possession of the transit camp premises. and Shaikh and his family had to live elsewhere. at their expense. “In total, around 32 years have now passed since the petitioner returned even the transit accommodation,” said bench of Judges GS Patel and Madhav Jamdar. “In short, the petitioner has been without permanent housing for 42 years.”
Shaikh’s lawyer, Anita Castellino, said in November 2019 that he had been allocated another permanent accommodation of 271 square feet in Chinchpokli (East) for Rs 66,000, which he had deposited, only to receive a letter in December informing him that his award had been canceled.
After hearing from attorney Kamlesh Ghumre for Mhada and seeing the letter, the HC said he did not indicate any reason for such a cancellation at all. Another letter followed in October 2020 requesting the original documents and confirming that previously Shaikh was eligible for permanent housing, the HC said.
Shaikh had thus pushed the HC to contest Mhada’s action against him as “arbitrary, unreasonable and irrational”.
“The fact that the petitioner got an award letter after verification displaces any argument that (he) was not an original tenant or was not eligible,” the HC said, adding after granting a permanent housing, “if this is to be canceled, it must be for good reasons, discernible, justifiable and declared”.
The HC also upheld three other unwarranted cancellations in three other petitions filed by tenants and ordered Mhada to give them possession by January 24.
The HC said that it was not disputed that on November 26, 2019, after a full check of all documents, each tenant was allocated another permanent accommodation from different areas in Chinchpokli against different payment amounts. The Mhada had drawn up a master list to decide on the inter se seniority between those who should be accommodated in the reconstructed premises. Eligibility was decided on the basis of various documents. The disputes were not over the area to be provided.
The HC stated in each case: “Respondents’ cancellation of the award on December 10, 2019 cannot stand. It is canceled and put aside. The award letter of November 26, 2019 is reinstated and confirmed. ” Source link

Student saves £ 4,300 per year by staying in hotel rather than digs or hallways Fri, 07 Jan 2022 10:18:10 +0000

A student revealed that she saves more than £ 4,300 per year by living in a hotel rather than university accommodation.

And others have revealed they are using a similar trick to save thousands of pounds.

Tigerlily Taylor, 20, posted her story on TIC Tac and received 48.7,000 likes and 677.3,000 views, with many other students showing their appreciation for this tip.

lumenhinata said “Genie, I saved so much money”, snapback3G said “I do it too, but at the Premier Inn” and Bethanyblissett said “I do it too”.

Ms Taylor, who lives in Berkhamsted, Hertfordshire, attends the University of Northampton.

Tigerlily told MoneySuperMarket: “On average, university accommodation costs £ 620 per month (that’s for a large en-suite bedroom).

“My hotel room usually costs around £ 35 a night and I only need to stay once a week, so every month I spend an average of £ 140 on a double room at the Travelodge.”

She also revealed that she spends an extra £ 30 to get around twice a week. Three days a week, she is required to attend university with one of those days separate from the other two.

That day, she only commutes for the day. In total she spends £ 260 per month which is a huge savings of £ 360 per month and £ 4,320 per year if she lived in university accommodation.

Many students are now only required to attend university a few days a week, with the rest being taught online. Depending on how many people you need to go to a hotel, it might cost less.

MoneySuperMarket also found out for how many college towns it would work by finding out the cost per night of the 557 Travelodges in England, Scotland and Wales for each available date in 2022.

They compared it with the new Unipol and NUS data, examining the average cost of university accommodation in the UK. (The data was released on December 10, 2021).


Average rent for student accommodation per week (£)

The average price of a Travelodge in this area for one night (£)

No max. days when a hotel is cheaper




3 nights / 4 days at the university




2 nights / 3 days at the university

North West



2 nights / 3 days at the university

East of England



2 nights / 3 days at the university




2 nights / 3 days at the university




4 nights / 5 days at the university

South West



2 nights / 3 days at the university

South East



3 nights / 4 days at the university




2 nights / 3 days at the university

North Ireland


n / A

Jo Thornhill of MoneySuperMarket said: “.

“Surprisingly, we have found that the most cost effective areas to switch to hotel accommodation are for students attending universities in London. Students in London with 5 or less days in college would be better off paying for a hotel rather than student accommodation.

When asked what other advice Tigerlily had for college students, she replied, “I would say that would be to open a student bank account, as some banks offer interest-free overdrafts and other perks.

“Another tip would be as soon as your student loan arrives, budget it immediately. It is so easy to spend it all but instead I would suggest having a plan for the money and putting some money aside for necessities first, whatever is left can be saved for the luxury.

For more information, tips and tricks, and to find the best deals for you, visit SilverSuperMarket.

Source link

DOT suspends accreditation and fines hotel for violating “Poblacion girl” quarantine Wed, 05 Jan 2022 01:35:00 +0000

Manila, Philippines (Updated at 12:04 p.m.)– The Tourism Department said on Wednesday it had suspended accreditation of a Makati City hotel that did not bar its guest, a traveler from the United States who later tested positive for COVID-19, d ” breaking the quarantine rules and leaving the premises to attend a party.

The DOT said it also revoked the Berjaya Hotel Makati’s license as a multi-use hotel. Multi-use hotels are “accommodation establishments that have been inspected by a team of DOT and Quarantine Office staff and found to be suitable for accommodating clients in quarantine and not in quarantine due to compliance with regulations. standards of physical separation of guests. “

In addition, the Makati Hotel was also “fined twice the fixed rate of its most expensive room” or equivalent to a fine of 13,200 P.

The tourism department added that the sanctions approved by its regulatory, coordination and resource generation unit were recommended by DOT-NCR.

Berjaya was penalized after the return of Filipino Gwyneth Anne Chua, nicknamed “Poblacion girl” on social media, was spotted partying in Poblacion, Makati City, when she was supposed to be in compulsory quarantine at the hotel.

The DOT previously asked the Makati Hotel to submit its response to the “quarantine skip incident” allegations within three days through the Notice of Explanation.

In her response dated January 1, Berjaya admitted that Chua left the hotel after checking in on her arrival date on December 22.

CCTV footage showed she had left the scene at 11:45 p.m., just 15 minutes after recording.

“Neither the hotel security staff nor the lobby caught his attention, and no effort was made to report the incident to the Quarantine Office: even after he returned three days later. . She was then seen in social media posts at a bar in Poblacion, ”the DOT statement read.

“Chua, who had been booked for a mandatory five-day hotel quarantine until December 27, returned later that night of December 25. She underwent an RT-PCR test on December 26. Her result is turned positive the next day, “he said. added.

In a letter dated December 29, 2021, Berjaya assured the agency that his quarantined guests “follow strict protocols.” However, he later apologized in a press release and on social media for failing to stop Chua from breaking quarantine rules and for failing to report the quarantine violation.

The DOT decision said that the hotel management’s statements and public apology were “an admission not only of the facts of the incident, but also of their failures in their responsibility as an accredited establishment of the Ministry of Tourism”.

The tourist agency said it had already served the copy of the decision on Berjaya. He has 15 working days to appeal the decision.

The decision was also forwarded to other relevant bodies such as the Ministry of Health, BOQ, One-Stop-Shop-Management of Returning Overseas Filipino of the Ministry of Transport -Board of Transport Safety, Ministry of the Interior and local governments, Ministry of Labor and Employment, Overseas Workers Welfare Administration, Department of Trade and Industry, and Makati local government unit.

The DOT said earlier that accommodation establishments that fail to comply with the health and safety protocols of the DOT and the DOH or the Inter-Agency Task Force for the Management of Emerging Infectious Diseases are at risk of ” criminal penalties of fines and / or imprisonment, and administrative penalties. such as suspension or revocation of accreditation depending on the seriousness of the offense.

Source link

HomeToGo acquires AMIVAC from the SeLoger Group and expands its operations in France Mon, 03 Jan 2022 07:03:45 +0000

Market leader in alternative accommodation closes acquisition of SeLoger Group’s vacation rental business unit, including its brands, and

LUXEMBOURG, January 03, 2022– (BUSINESS WIRE) – HomeToGo SE (Frankfurt Stock Exchange: HTG), the marketplace with the world’s largest choice of vacation rentals, today announced the acquisition of AMIVAC, the business unit vacation rental from the SeLoger Group, which operates the French brands, and

This press release features multimedia. View the full release here:

Dr Patrick Andrae, Co-Founder and CEO, HomeToGo | HomeToGo SE (Frankfurt Stock Exchange: HTG), the marketplace with the world’s largest choice of vacation rentals, today announced the acquisition of AMIVAC, the vacation rental business unit of the SeLoger Group, which operates the French brands, and (Photo: Business Wire)

The acquired brands operated by AMIVAC provide subscription registration services to owners and professional agencies, which will contribute to the growth of HomeToGo’s subscription and services platform. The sale is part of the SeLoger Group’s strategy to focus on its core business, real estate research.

Dr Patrick Andrae, Co-Founder and CEO, HomeToGo: “We are very pleased to add the SeLoger Group vacation rental unit to our portfolio, which will give AMIVAC’s clients and professional agencies an added advantage of the advanced technological solutions offered by HomeToGo, while also serving our customers with a wide range of unique and high-quality products. vacation rentals in France. The vacation rental market is incredibly fragmented in France and internationally, but is changing rapidly and accelerating its growth with the favorable winds of the pandemic. The combination of AMIVAC’s already high brand awareness and our global reach provides an incredible opportunity for both our newly acquired partners and our business as we look to the future. “

Caroline de Gantès, Country General Manager, SeLoger Group: “The strategy of the SeLoger Group is to focus on its core business – simplifying and improving real estate research – to improve the experience of buying, renting and selling property for everyone in France. We are convinced that with the ongoing consolidation of the vacation rental market in France and abroad, HomeToGo’s leadership stature in the alternative accommodation sector offers exciting new opportunities for the brands Amivac, SeLoger Vacances and “

For the future, the, and brands will continue to operate under their independent identities. The acquisition was signed in August 2021 and finalized on January 1, 2022.

About the SeLoger Group

For nearly 30 years, the SeLoger Group has been innovating in real estate in France through its 11 specialized online platforms.

Groupe SeLoger offers a modern real estate search experience that uses a personalized, data-driven approach to better serve its clients and allow the purchase, sale or lease of properties with peace of mind. Thanks to its advanced platform technology, the SeLoger Group makes it possible to offer fully customizable selections of goods anywhere in France according to the unique criteria of each client.

The greatest value of the SeLoger Group can be attributed to its talented team of 800 employees, based in Paris, France.

About HomeToGo

HomeToGo was founded in 2014 with the vision of making amazing homes easily accessible to everyone. To pursue this vision, HomeToGo has been able to consistently create and develop a reliable and easy-to-use technology platform that brings together real estate providers with travelers from all over the world.

HomeToGo operates an marketplace for alternative accommodation that connects millions of travelers looking for a perfect place to stay with thousands of inventory providers around the world, resulting in the most valuable inventory coverage. world’s most comprehensive in the alternative accommodation space.

HomeToGo’s marketplace is beneficial to both of its customer groups: consumers who visit HomeToGo websites have access to the largest inventory in one place, and vendor partners who use the platform’s reach and technology solutions. are better able to serve a wide range of customers and generate more high quality demand.

While HomeToGo SE is headquartered in Luxembourg, HomeToGo GmbH is headquartered in Berlin, Germany. HomeToGo operates websites and applications located in 23 countries.

HomeToGo SE is listed on the Frankfurt Stock Exchange under the ticker symbol “HTG”. For more information visit:

See the source version on


Caroline burns

SeLoger Group
Sarah kroishvili

Source link

Landowners are now the scapegoats for the housing crisis in the state | Examiner Sat, 01 Jan 2022 06:00:00 +0000

news, local news,

Why would someone give up their precious home or investment property for rent when they can earn twice as much with Airbnb? Years ago I had to move to Launceston for work, so I rented my house in Hobart. I might as well have handed it over to vandals. I chose my first tenants by mistake because they said they knew a mutual friend, who despaired for me when she found out who the tenants were. My blunder. When I finally got rid of them, the property was in a rotten mess. They had sublet the garage and left traces of drug manufacturing. It cost me thousands to fix it. Goodbye rent. Yes, I got some back from insurance and homeowners insurance, but I was the loser. So I used agents who kept dropping me. They wouldn’t have taken the tenants to court because I guess it would have cost money, and some seemed to side with the tenants in the disputes. Stockholm Syndrome. I had bad agents and very good ones. When I returned to Hobart my wife and I vowed never to use agents again. She was burned twice, once by a lovely old lady who was looking for accommodation, only to find out much later that it was a sting to find accommodation for her thugs who got us into endless trouble. She returned home to Sydney. The most common problem we encountered were tenants who stopped paying rent because they were breaking the lease, forcing us to lower the deposit. The Airbnb industry faces tough regulation, judging by a parliamentary inquiry into housing affordability that recommended a license freeze in areas with high housing demand and a limit on the number of nights a property can stay. be registered for short-term accommodation. The state government is not opposed to these recommendations and why not because it is blaming the government on the middle class fighters who are trying to make money. In the survey report, the housing and rental affordability crisis is attributed to a dramatic increase in tourism, a dramatic acceleration in the population, as well as an increase in the number of UTAS students abroad. and an increase in short-stay accommodation listings. The international student factor has calmed down with the onset of COVID, but is expected to rise again.So, in the crucible of factors affecting the housing affordability market, three of the four factors are linked to government actions. The small Airbnb industry is being whipped so that governments at all levels get away with it. It is clearly evident that just as the state government has been caught off guard by road transport congestion, it is just as caught off guard by the accommodation industry. Airbnb says its market represents more than $ 86 million in customer spending, supports 600 jobs and contributes more than $ 55 million per year to our gross state product, with customer base growing 3% per year. Why wouldn’t I use Airbnb? Good returns, better control over client and owner behavior, as long as you can rate yourself publicly, and I don’t lose control over ownership, which means I can block dates when I want to. ‘use. Rental laws have been changed so tenants have much more power, which is acceptable in terms of privacy and autonomy, but landlords are now crippled by the options they have when it comes to accommodation. dishonest tenants. Let’s face it; Airbnb is a growing industry because it is popular with homeowners and tourists. It is a threat to the hotel and high-rise accommodation industry as they fail to keep up with the growing number of tourists, and some hotels have been sidelined to serve as quarantine centers. On housing affordability and waiting lists, thanks to Senator Jacqui Lambie, the Commonwealth has freed Tasmania from a $ 150 million real estate debt, which I guess would lead to between 500 and 600 new ones. housing. In this year’s budget, the state government says it is spending more than $ 615 million on affordable housing and homelessness, which will create thousands of new homes over the next six years. So there is help on the way, even if this government is doing things at a relaxed pace. To save more time, I’m sure the state government, aided by some advice, will make the Airbnb industry the scapegoat for a first low blow. They will indirectly demonize us as greedy predators of the poor, blaming short-term housing as the bane of housing affordability. A conservative government with supposed laissez-faire values ​​will behave like a creeping socialist government, meddling in the affairs of every middle-class fighter in its sights. It will assume that these victims will always vote Liberals, smile and support him. I am not so sure. When governments break into the market, everyone suffers.



Source link

Jamal Khashoggi’s killers live in luxury villas in Riyadh, witnesses say | Jamal Khashoggi Thu, 30 Dec 2021 20:31:00 +0000

At least three members of a Saudi squad convicted by the kingdom for the murder of Jamal Khashoggi live and work “in seven-star accommodation” inside a government-run security complex in Riyadh, a linked source says to senior Saudi intelligence officials.

The assassins are said to be housed in villas and buildings run by Saudi Arabia’s state security agency, far from the walls of its infamous prisons. The source spoke to two witnesses who claim to have seen the men. They said family members frequently visit the men, who can use a gym and work spaces at the site.

All were sentenced in a Saudi court, in a trial widely condemned as a sham – although only one of them, Salah al-Tubaigy – was named. Some received death sentences, which were later commuted to life imprisonment.

The observations cast further doubt on Riyadh’s claims that the killers are held to account and Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman’s most trusted adviser, Saud al-Qahtani, has reappeared in the royal court after three years in secrecy. Qahtani was acquitted of all involvement, despite an assessment by Western intelligence that he organized the assassination at the behest of Prince Mohammed.

The source confirmed that Tubaigy, the medical examiner who dismembered Khashoggi inside the Saudi consulate in Istanbul, was among those seen inside the facility. Mustafa al-Madani, the body sent in duplicate by the hitman team to create the ruse that Khashoggi left the consulate alive, was also seen, as was Mansour Abahussein, who is accused of leading the operation.

The two witnesses have visited the complex on several occasions over the past two years. They say the men were relaxed and appeared to be performing normal tasks. Visitors, including caterers, gardeners, technicians and family members, frequent the compound frequently, according to the intelligence source.

The sightings of Tubaigy, Abahussein and Madani took place in late 2019 and around mid-2020. Witnesses did not want to publicly disclose their names for fear of reprisals from Prince Mohammed and state security, which has the heavy hand in Saudi Arabia. Abahussein and Madani are known to be intelligence agents employed by state security. Their boss, Abdul Aziz bin Mohammed Al-Howairini, was seen with some of the defendants and is often seen using the compound’s gymnasium.

In December 2019, after a procedure shrouded in secrecy, a Saudi court acquitted three defendants; sentenced five others to death; and five others to prison terms. The five men on death row were not organizers and were eventually legally pardoned in May 2020 by Khashoggi’s children as part of an arrangement brokered by Prince Mohammed.

Little has been revealed, so far, about the fate of the main players in the plot. But their apparent presence in a modern and well-equipped intelligence complex, where they enjoy freedom of movement, is in flagrant contradiction with assurances from the Saudi royal court that the perpetrators face stiff penalties.

The revelations come as mystery continues to surround the identity of a man arrested by French police this month, who was initially identified as a member of a secondary team of Khashoggi assassins. Khaled Aedh al-Otaibi was arrested at Charles de Gaulle airport on December 7 on the basis of a warrant issued by Turkey.

Police later said the arrest was a case of mistaken identity. However, Turkish officials believe France may have captured the right man and released him for political reasons.

A well-placed source confirmed to the Guardian that Turkish officials had reported their concerns, saying the data they provided to Interpol matched what French police initially sent them.

Prince Mohammed is known to be anxious to prevent further details of the assassination from being made public – a scenario that would have been likely had one of the killers been extradited to Turkey and tried in open court.

French President Emmanuel Macron was received by Prince Mohammed in Jeddah earlier this month during a Western leader’s first visit to Saudi Arabia since the scandal erupted in October 2018. In return, Macron had insisted that the Saudi de facto leader receives a call from Lebanese Prime Minister Najib Mikati, potentially paving the way for Riyadh to send aid to the bankrupt country.

In the days following France’s release of the arrested man, the language used by Saudi and Gulf officials towards Lebanon has softened considerably.

Source link

Experts: no need to hospitalize all people infected with Omicron Wed, 29 Dec 2021 06:20:00 +0000

COVID-19 experts recommend that the government drop its current policy of automatically hospitalizing all Omicron patients, saying medical facilities could be understaffed during the year-end and New Year’s holidays.

They also said quarantine rules should be relaxed for people who have been in close contact with people infected with the Omicron variant to avoid overloading designated accommodation facilities.

Seventeen experts, including Shigeru Omi, who heads the government’s panel of experts on the COVID-19 pandemic, and Takaji Wakita, director of the National Institute of Infectious Diseases, submitted their recommendations to Minister of Health Shigeyuki Goto and Daishiro Yamagiwa, the responsible Minister of State. of economic revitalization, December 28.

They said hospitalizations for Omicron patients should be based on the severity of their symptoms, which is the measurement taken for other variants of the novel coronavirus.

Wakita told a press conference that the main goal of the automatic hospitalization policy “is not treatment but isolation”.

“Local health care resources need to be properly allocated,” he said.

Experts also called for a change in the policy to require all people who were in the vicinity of a person with the Omicron variant to self-isolate in designated accommodation facilities.

They said those people in close contact should be allowed to stay in their homes depending on the availability of secure facilities.

In addition, experts urged the government to allow Omicron patients to share hospital rooms with Delta variant patients, instead of separating them into private rooms for a single patient.

Under current policy, Omicron patients are required to undergo two polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests and one negative test before they can be discharged from hospitals.

But experts said the government should allow these patients to be released 10 days after symptoms start.

As of December 27, 316 Omicron infections have been confirmed nationwide. Community transmissions of the variant have also been reported in an increasing number of prefectures.

Healthcare facilities have called for a loosening of strict policies against the Omicron variant, saying patients with mild symptoms could end up filling all hospital beds.

Local governments have also called for more relaxed rules for international travelers. Local authorities are responsible for contacting people who have come into “close contact” with a passenger on the same flight who has been infected with the Omicron strain, as well as securing accommodation facilities for them.

So far, a total of 10,000 passengers have been found to be in close contact.

Local governments have said they cannot handle the growing burden.

The Ministry of Health, from December 28, refined its definition of “close contact”. Instead of covering everyone on the same flight as an infected passenger, the definition now refers to people sitting in the two rows in front of and behind the traveler with the virus.

Source link

What private companies need to know – NBC New York Mon, 27 Dec 2021 10:54:02 +0000

New York City’s toughest immunization mandate, which covers all of its private-sector workforce, goes into effect Monday. The mayor presented a number of specific directives and other details regarding the planned expansion.

Still, there are a number of unresolved questions for many of the parties involved. Here is a list of frequently asked questions and the town hall’s answers to each one.

1. What should I do as an employer?

Workers must provide or have provided proof of COVID-19 vaccination to their employers by December 27, and a company (a “covered entity”) must exclude from the workplace any worker who has not provided such proof, with some exceptions.
due to religious or medical accommodation applies, or a worker never enters the workplace except for a quick and limited purpose.

2. How do I know if I am covered by the order?

First, the ordinance only applies to workplaces in New York. Many types of
businesses are covered by the order. Any non-government entity that employs more than one worker in New York is covered. The same goes for any non-government entity that maintains or operates a workplace in New York City.

A “workplace” is any place where work is performed in the presence of another worker or a member of the public. People who are self-employed or sole proprietors are not covered by the ordinance unless they work at a workplace, interact with other workers in person, or interact with the public in person while working. .

Some examples of covered entities include clothing stores, grocery stores, taxis or carpool owner-operators, speech-language pathologists who make home visits, and writers who rent offices in shared workspaces. The ordinance does not apply to covered entities or to persons already subject to another order of the commissioner of the department, the board of health, the mayor or any state or federal entity that requires them to maintain or provide evidence. full vaccination. It does not apply to persons who have obtained requests for reasonable accommodation.

Covered entities or individuals who are subject to federal requirements
that are not currently in effect due to a court order must comply with that order.

3. Do I keep records of proof of vaccination for all workers?

It is simpler and more efficient to keep track of the proof of vaccination of each worker. You can do this either: 1) by making a copy or taking a photo of their proof of vaccination or 2) by creating your own paper or electronic file that includes the following information for each worker: name, vaccination status, date of vaccination. proof of the second dose for workers who presented only one proof. (More information on this here.)

If you are hiring a contract worker, you do not need to keep a record of
vaccination status. Instead, you can ask the contractor’s employer to confirm that the contractor is vaccinated, and you must keep a record of your request and confirmation.

4. Do I keep records of reasonable accommodation?

Yes, if one of your workers does not get the vaccine because you have approved reasonable accommodation for them based on their religion or state of health, you will need to have a record of when you granted the vaccine. reasonable accommodation, the basis for doing so, and any supporting documents provided by the worker for the reasonable accommodation.

5. What if a worker says religion or a medical condition prevents COVID vaccination?

Workers who have a sincere religious belief (not a social or political belief) or a health problem that prevents them from being vaccinated may request reasonable accommodation. They must apply by December 27 and that begins the reasonable accommodation process. Employers can allow workers to continue entering the workplace while their exemption requests are pending.

However, city agencies can review a covered entity’s exemption process and records to ensure that the entity is processing requests promptly and appropriately.
Tips on how to deal with reasonable accommodation requests as well as a checklist employers can use to deal with reasonable accommodation requests can be found here. If an employer chooses to follow this checklist and
in the file, which shows that the request was dealt with in an appropriate manner.

Romney Smith reports.

6. If workers submit proof of a single dose of a two-dose vaccine, do I need to ensure that they receive their second dose?

The requirement for December 27 is proof of ONE DOSE. Workers must get their
second dose within 45 days. If they do not have proof of a second dose within this timeframe
time, you should exclude them from the workplace until they can show proof of vaccination for their second dose.

7. Can unvaccinated workers enter the workplace for any reason?

Yes, workers can enter a quick and limited purpose even if they have not presented the required proof of vaccination. Some examples of a quick and limited objective include using the bathroom, delivering, or pointing and receiving a mission before setting out to begin a solitary mission.

8. Are there any other requirements?

The Ministry of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH) has created a page
attestation sign that you must complete and post in a conspicuous place to your
undertaken before December 27. The attestation panel certifies that you comply
with the command. You must display this official certificate even if you had previously
your own signage on employee immunization status.

If you have previously posted a review under the Key to NYC Restaurant Requirements,
fitness centers and entertainment venues, you don’t need to publish the
DOHMH attestation sign.

9. What if I checked the immunization status of my workers before this order was issued?

This is all you need! You are ready if you have the records required by the order, and
have displayed the DOHMH attestation board in a conspicuous place.

10. What if my business is one of more than one location, such as a chain restaurant?

Each individual business location is covered by the order and must display the
DOHMH attestation sign in a prominent location that affirms the business is in
respect of the order. A company with multiple locations can store
employee vaccination records in a central location, as well as
accommodation records, if applicable, instead of having such records available to everyone.

Each business location should have contact details available to offer to city inspectors to put them in touch with the company representative who is at the central level.
store these records for the business.

11. Do I need to verify proof of vaccination for workers who do not live in New York?

Yes, the requirement is specific to New York City workplaces and where the worker
lives is irrelevant to the order.

12. How can I verify the information?

You must ask to see one of the types of proof of vaccination below, along with a
identification. Acceptable forms of identification include driver’s licenses, government identification cards for non-drivers, IDNYC cards, passports, school or work identification cards.

Individuals can also show copies of their ID, including a photo on their phone or by using an app like NYC Covid Safe that allows them to view a copy of the document.

UCLA’s Dr Timothy Brewer says booster doses of the coronavirus vaccine can help your immune system against the Omicron variant much better than your first and second vaccines. Immune systems that have received more doses are able to have “a broader response,” he explains.

13. What proof is sufficient?

Sufficient proof can be demonstrated by posting a photo or hard copy of the CDC vaccination card, NYC COVID Safe app, New York State Excelsior Pass, CLEAR digital vaccine card, CLEAR Health Pass or of the official vaccination record. A photo or hard copy of an official vaccination record of a vaccine administered outside the United States for AstraZeneca / SK Bioscience, Serum Institute of India / COVISHIELD and Vaxzevria, Sinopharm or Sinovac vaccines is also accepted.

14. What if a worker refuses?

If a worker is in the workplace for more than a quick and limited purpose and has not requested reasonable accommodation, you should not allow them to enter the workplace.

15. Should I dismiss or sanction for non-compliance?

No. As long as you keep the worker out of the workplace, it’s your decision to discipline or fire that worker or whether the worker can contribute to your business while working remotely.

16. Are there penalties for non-compliance by companies?

Our goal is always to educate and work with businesses to help them achieve
compliance. We always prefer to ensure compliance and avoid fines and
penalties. If a business refuses to comply, it is liable to a fine of $ 1,000 and escalating penalties thereafter if the violations persist.

17. Who can I call for questions about inspections?

Call the Small Business Services hotline at 888-SBS-4-NYC.

Mayor Bill de Blasio announced major new extensions to the vaccine mandate on Monday. Andrew Siff reports.

Source link

The “horrible” experience of helping the homeless in temporary accommodation that she shared with 100 people Sat, 25 Dec 2021 08:00:00 +0000

Conditions in some temporary homeless housing in North Wales have been condemned as “shocking” and “horrific” by the homeless charity Shelter Cymru.

It was revealed to North Wales Live that in some cases residents share limited facilities while staying alongside 100 people in hotels.

As new coronavirus restrictions loom, charities fear it will be the last straw for those struggling to make ends meet.

If so, they say some temporary housing needs urgent upgrading in order to properly accommodate an influx of extremely vulnerable members of society.

Read more: Homeless mother of five must live on £ 33 a week for Christmas

Jennie Bibbings, Campaigns Manager for Shelter Cymru, said the number of temporary accommodation across Wales is “higher than ever”.

Councils run campaigns to help street sleepers get off the streets

She said: “Local authorities have long waiting lists to place people in temporary accommodation, and it is technically illegal.

“Everyone on this waiting list has a legal right to emergency accommodation, and yet the advice just says we know we have a duty to accommodate you, but there is simply nowhere for you. to put.

“All of those people who are on the waiting lists sleep in the streets in tents or vehicles, or they can rely on their friends and family and stay on sofas.

“They are all in very precarious situations. If another foreclosure happened and suddenly all of these people were in need of housing, I have no idea how that could happen.

“The housing system has so many flaws. Affordable housing and social housing are both so scarce. The pandemic has really shown the failings of the housing market. “

The vagrancy law has been criticized in recent times for the way it is used against the homeless, with many believing that it is there only to criminalize those who have gone through hard times.

Ms Bibbings said: ‘This is non-delegated legislation so there is not much we can do about it in Wales. But it’s a really obscure historical law that makes you wonder why this law is on the books. It’s pre-Victorian.

“Moving people out of city centers does not offer them housing, support and does not solve the situation in any way.

“We don’t think this kind of approach has a place in 21st century Britain.”

Being homeless in North Wales paints a sad picture.

With the housing market overwhelmed by outside buyers pushing up prices, residents are struggling to find their own homes and are subsequently forced onto the streets, and the support does not look so promising.

“I hear some pretty horrific stories about some of the temporary housing in North Wales,” Ms Bibbings said.

“There was a woman who lived in a dwelling with 100 other people. And between them, they had two microwaves between 100 people.

“She kept asking us for advice, really distressed. She worked in a care facility and therefore had to wash her clothes between each shift, but there were no washing facilities in the accommodation, so she struggled to make it work.

“What made matters worse was that she barely ate. She shared two microwaves with 100 other people, so of course she lost a lot of weight as well.

Hostels are another last resort that many are turning to, although Ms Bibbings said some places in North Wales appear to be falling below par in this department again.

“There’s one in Wrexham where you have to be at 6pm and, if you’re not at 6pm, you might not come in that night at all,” she said.

“It’s quite restrictive, having to work every day with a 6pm curfew in your life. I’ve heard that an 8pm curfew can be common, but a 6pm curfew hours, I think, is particularly strict. “

You don’t have to live on the streets to be considered homeless, and there are thousands of homeless people who don’t fit into this category.

“When people think of homelessness, they think of sleeping on the streets,” Ms. Bibbings said.

“Sleeping on the streets is a form of homelessness, but it really is the end. At any time, there are hundreds of people sleeping rough. But what you don’t see are the thousands of people in Wales who are homeless but not visible.

“Private rents in Wales are growing faster than anywhere else in the UK, and social housing is like potholes. It’s so hard to find a new place to live, and that’s when people have to fall back on the homeless system.

We have been living with a pandemic for almost two years, but it seems pretty clear that we have been suffering from a homeless epidemic in North Wales for some time now, and this also deserves increased attention.

Follow this link to donate or see how you can help Shelter Cymru support those in desperate need..

What do you think of this story? Let us know in the comments

Source link

8 Things Boston Employers Need to Know About the In-City Vaccination Mandate | Fisher phillips Thu, 23 Dec 2021 15:53:07 +0000

Boston Mayor Michelle Wu has just announced that the city will require proof of COVID-19 vaccination to enter indoor food, entertainment, recreation and fitness establishments. Other Greater Boston city leaders have also announced plans to implement vaccine proof warrants as part of a collective regional effort to address high rates of COVID-19 cases while preserving indoor gatherings. . The Phase I of Boston’s vaccine proof mandate, announced on December 20 and taking effect January 15, doesn’t leave companies much time to prepare. Here are eight things Boston employers need to know about the tenure:

  1. Who is covered: The Mayor’s Order requires the following Boston entities to verify the proof of vaccination status of full-time and part-time employees, interns, volunteers, on-site contractors and clients before allowing entry into the premises. interior spaces of:
    • Catering establishments, including restaurants and bars, but excluding charitable catering services such as soup kitchens or businesses offering food and / or drink exclusively for off-premises or off-premises consumption;
    • Indoor entertainment, recreation and event venues, including cinemas, concert and music halls, commercial event and party venues, museums and galleries, professional sports arenas and indoor stadiums, convention centers and exhibition halls, performing arts theaters and bowling alleys; and
    • Gyms and fitness establishments, including commercial gyms, fitness rooms, yoga / Pilates / barre / dance studios, boxing / kickboxing gyms, fitness boot camps, indoor swimming pools and other facilities used to hold classes group fitness.

    For the purposes of the Decree, a space will be considered “interior” if it has a roof or overhang and is surrounded by at least three walls.

  2. When: Before entering the interior parts of the covered entities, people will need to prove their immunization status according to the following staggered schedule.
    • Phase 1: from the January 15th, people aged 12 and over must prove that they have received at least a dose of COVID-19 vaccine, in a single-dose or two-dose series;
    • Phase 2: from the February 15, people 12 years of age and over must prove that they have received of them doses of a series of two-dose COVID-19 vaccines or a dose of a single dose series;
    • Phase 3: from the 1st of March, people aged 5 to 11 must prove that they have received at least a dose of COVID-19 vaccine, in a single-dose or two-dose series; and
    • Phase 4: from the May 1, people aged 5 and over must prove that they have received of them doses of a series of two-dose COVID-19 vaccines or a dose of a single dose series.
  3. Proof of vaccination: Acceptable forms of proof of vaccination are: (i) a card from the CDC COVID-19 vaccination record, or a digital image or digital or physical photograph of the card; (ii) any other official vaccination record from the jurisdiction, state or country where the vaccine was administered, or a digital or physical photograph of the record; (iii) a letter, digital image or report from a healthcare provider, pharmacy or vaccination site establishing proof of vaccination against COVID-19; or (iv) any vaccine verification smartphone application developed by the Commonwealth of Massachusetts or developed or approved by the City of Boston. Mayor Wu’s administration said it intends to develop its own smartphone app for this purpose.
  4. Signage requirement: All covered entities must display a sign, which will be available at or pick up in cities, at their entrances. The sign will inform clients and others that they must be vaccinated to access the interior spaces of the covered entity.
  5. Consequences of non-compliance: Each instance in which a Covered Entity fails to verify an individual’s immunization status will be considered a separate prescription violation. The ordinance states that “all reasonable efforts” will be made to ensure voluntary compliance of entities through awareness and education, as well as written warnings. However, he also warns that consequences of non-compliance can include fines of $ 300 per violation and cease and desist orders from the Boston Public Health Commission.
  6. Limited exceptions: The following categories of people will be allowed to enter interior parts of Covered Entities without showing proof of vaccination, but only if they are wearing face masks: (i) People entering a Covered Entity for quick and limited reasons, such as using a toilet, placing or retrieving an order or service, making a delivery or making necessary repairs; (ii) performers who are not regularly employed by a Covered Entity and who are on site to perform; (iii) professional athletes / sports teams who enter a covered entity as part of their regular employment and to participate in competitions; and (iv) persons accompanying an entertainer or professional athlete / sports team to a covered entity as part of their regular employment, as long as the performer or professional athlete / sports team is performing or compete in the covered premises.

    It is important to note that the decree also does not apply to public and non-public schools and programs from Kindergarten to Grade 12, child care programs, senior centers, community centers, locations in residential or office buildings that are restricted for use by residents, landlords or tenants, colleges or universities that have a vaccine requirement covering staff and students, or any other site that does not is not otherwise open to the general public.

  7. Employee accommodation: The Order is clearly silent on the subject of disability or religious objections to the mandate. However, covered entities are reminded that a mandate does not exempt them from their obligations under federal and state laws to provide accommodations to eligible employees. Employers are reminded that they must engage in the interactive process to determine if and how they can provide reasonable accommodation when needed. Each decision should be based on the facts of the employer’s workplace and other factors, such as whether the employee can work remotely, whether the employee can work alone, and the nature of the work and its interaction with it. other employees or customers.
  8. Client hosting: It is important to note that an employer’s obligation to customers differs significantly from its obligation to employees. As noted in our previous overview, accommodation situations with clients are fraught with pitfalls for the unwary. In its FAQ, the City reminds covered entities that it must enter into a dialogue with a client seeking accommodation, but that it can exclude an unvaccinated client if the client is a “direct threat”. Employers covered by the College would be advised to train their staff and have a plan in place when the first client requests accommodation or is not otherwise in a complaint with the College.

What should you do

Less than a month before the proof of vaccination warrant goes into effect, you must take immediate action to comply. This means ensuring that, if the Order applies to your business, the people working on your premises – including not only your employees, but also interns, volunteers and on-site contractors – have received their vaccines. It also means displaying the signage described above and preparing your employees to check the immunization statuses of customers and others entering interior spaces of your business, starting January 15, 2022.

The Boston Public Health Commission is expected to issue additional written guidelines on the vaccine evidence warrant.

Source link